Elon Musk accuses Twitter algorithm of manipulation as U-turn speculation

Date:

Share post:

Spread the love

One of the year’s biggest tech stories so far is the proposed acquisition of Twitter by one Elon Musk in a deal that could be worth about $44 billion (opens in new tab). Since then the action has been more-or-less non-stop: a handful of Twitter executives were ousted (opens in new tab), Musk last week announced the deal was “temporarily on hold” thanks to bots (opens in new tab), and now… well, it looks like Musk is trying to deliberately wind-up Twitter.

There’s been some speculation, given Musk’s behaviour since the deal was announced, that he may have had second thoughts and be looking for a face-saving way to back out of the deal. The delay to focus on bots and question Twitter’s public filings may well be of genuine concern, but the way Musk is going about things is, as ever, designed to provoke reaction—at the weekend, he announced that his team would be doing random sampling of Twitter users to come up with their own estimates of how many are bots.

See more

The problem? Musk went on to give further detail in a reply to another user (opens in new tab), writing: “Any sensible random sampling process is fine. If many people independently get similar results for % of fake/spam/duplicate accounts, that will be telling. I picked 100 as the sample size number, because that is what Twitter uses to calculate <5% fake/spam/duplicate."

Shortly afterwards, with a degree of faux-incredulity, Musk revealed that Twitter’s legal department called and complained that he had violated an NDA by revealing Twitter’s sample size number.

See more

But the billionaire troll was just getting warmed-up. He went on to remark that “the bots are angry at being counted” with a ROFL emoji (opens in new tab), referred to himself as a member of “the Illuminaughty”, tweeted fire emojis at Snoop Dogg (opens in new tab), and cracked jokes such as (opens in new tab): “Whoever thought owning the libs would be cheap never tried to acquire a social media company!”

Then he got in an argument with Twitter’s co-founder and former CEO, Jack Dorsey. Musk went on a kick about the Twitter algorithm, declaring to his 93.4 million followers that “You are being manipulated by the algorithm in ways you don’t realize” and so on. This being Twitter he was soon joined by a bunch of folk making various claims about how it does or doesn’t work.

Dorsey stuck his oar in and responded (opens in new tab): “They simply try to put the tweets that you’re *most likely* to engage with at the top. That’s it. Predictive based on what you like, retweet, reply to, search for, pause on, etc. it’s meant to be a convenience, nothing more. Again most important is being able to turn off.”

In response to the specific charge of manipulation, Dorsey added (opens in new tab): “no it wasn’t designed to manipulate. it was designed to catch you up and work off what you engage with. that can def have unintended consequences tho. which is why one should be able to choose if they use an algo or not, and which one. simple solution to all this.”

Following which, Musk somewhat rowed-back his original claims without withdrawing them (opens in new tab). “I’m not suggesting malice in the algorithm, but rather that it’s trying to guess what you might want to read and, in doing so, inadvertently manipulate/amplify your viewpoints without you realizing this is happening.”

Elon Musk on his phone.

(Image credit: Sopa via Getty)

First of all, Musk does have a point. Whatever the intentions behind these algorithms they can have, as Dorsey put it, “unintended consequences.” Dorsey has a point too, though, which is that Twitter does let users choose whether they want the algorithm or a chronological view.

But this isn’t really about the algorithm, nor was all the stuff about bots really about bots. Musk is making an awful lot of noise at the moment and, as someone who’s gotten in trouble for affecting stock prices with his social media use in the past (opens in new tab), clearly knows what effect his public pronouncements will have—which is to create uncertainty, a fug of confusion, and possible cover for a U-turn. 

It’s not really worth reading too much into Twitter’s share price because, unsurprisingly, it is currently on something of a rollercoaster ride of wild ups and downs, as shareholders wonder whether they’re going to get a lovely cheque from Mr Musk or be left high-and-dry. Everything is relative of course: should Musk pull out of the deal, he will have to pay Twitter a ‘cancellation fee’ of $1 billion—which is pocket change for him, but still a billion dollars.

Poor old Parag Agrawal, Twitter’s current CEO, has been understandably somewhat muted as the last few weeks have unfolded. He posted a thread on Friday, however, that suggests the Twitter higher-ups are wondering what’s happening with this deal too (opens in new tab): “While I expect the deal to close, we need to be prepared for all scenarios and always do what’s right for Twitter.”

Musk later replied to a tweet of Agrawal’s about the efficacy of external studies on bots with… a poop emoji.

Musk is clearly a remarkable and unusual individual with a laundry list of achievements. So it’s easy to forget that he can also on occasion be a weapons-grade troll, and adores internet humour. The Twitter takeover did seem like one of the year’s biggest tech stories: but now we’re not the only ones wondering whether Musk’s just taking everyone for a ride.

View Original Article Source Here

Get Paid To Write App Reviews

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Related articles

Forged in Fire: TOP 5 DEADLY VIDEO GAME WEAPONS |

Watch all new episodes of Forged in Fire, Wednesdays at 9/8c, and stay up to date on all...

Elon Musk accuses Twitter algorithm of manipulation as U-turn speculation

One of the year's biggest tech stories so far is the proposed acquisition of Twitter by one Elon...

PN playlist: the Nintendo games we’re playing this week

Wondering what the Pure Nintendo team has been playing lately? Our latest playlist includes a wide range of...

Game Scoop! 678: RE4 Remake & Final Fantasy 16 Reactions

Welcome back to IGN Game Scoop!, the ONLY video game podcast! This week your Omega Cops -- Daemon...
The Sorrowvirus
No Man’s Sky: Expedition 7
RICO London Review
Chefy-Chef Review
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Open Beta Reportedly Coming
The Lord of the Rings: Gollum Release Date Announced for
PlayStation Store Update Worldwide – May 24, 2022
Sony Criticized for Selling Horizon Forbidden West PS5 Bundle With
PN playlist: the Nintendo games we’re playing this week
Kangaroos and ponies join this week’s eShop roundup
PSA: You Might Not Need To Unbox The New Smash
Review: Dungeons of Dreadrock (Nintendo Switch)
Elon Musk accuses Twitter algorithm of manipulation as U-turn speculation
Square Enix made $394 million profit last year, and continues
The ‘E3’ 2022 schedule: all the summer showcases coming this
IT admin gets 7 years for wiping his company’s servers
Forged in Fire: TOP 5 DEADLY VIDEO GAME WEAPONS |
Subway Surfers Animated Cartoon Video Game World Tour Pro Gameplay
Splatoon 2 – Gameplay Walkthrough Part 1
LJN Wrestling and Other Games
GT Countdown
MLB The Show 22
Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance
Mina the Hollower
Game Scoop! 678: RE4 Remake & Final Fantasy 16 Reactions
South Of The Circle Is A Frigid Tale Of Survival
Lost Ark Receives Its First New Subclass Soon, The Glaivier
Europa Universalis 4’s Leviathan expansion gets April release date